<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does elitism stifle growth?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nicharalambous.com/2008/10/16/does-elitism-stifle-growth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nicharalambous.com/2008/10/16/does-elitism-stifle-growth/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:17:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Top 9 stops on the web &#171; Witness This</title>
		<link>http://nicharalambous.com/2008/10/16/does-elitism-stifle-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-9962</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 9 stops on the web &#171; Witness This</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 07:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicharalambous.com/?p=1549#comment-9962</guid>
		<description>[...] 10, 2008 &#183; No Comments  There’s been a lot of talk on the interweb about elitism and how a few have come to dominate the web space and dictate what counts as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 10, 2008 &middot; No Comments  There’s been a lot of talk on the interweb about elitism and how a few have come to dominate the web space and dictate what counts as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wogan</title>
		<link>http://nicharalambous.com/2008/10/16/does-elitism-stifle-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-9806</link>
		<dc:creator>Wogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicharalambous.com/?p=1549#comment-9806</guid>
		<description>@Nic I&#039;m all for getting good at what you do - but that&#039;s &quot;skilled&quot; and &quot;professionalism&quot; - in some cases, that&#039;s &quot;passion&quot;.

The very nature of anything elite is that it&#039;s a closed-doors, highly exclusive &quot;club&quot; - the polar opposite of the core of social media, which is openness and transparency. You can&#039;t have your cake and brag about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nic I&#8217;m all for getting good at what you do &#8211; but that&#8217;s &#8220;skilled&#8221; and &#8220;professionalism&#8221; &#8211; in some cases, that&#8217;s &#8220;passion&#8221;.</p>
<p>The very nature of anything elite is that it&#8217;s a closed-doors, highly exclusive &#8220;club&#8221; &#8211; the polar opposite of the core of social media, which is openness and transparency. You can&#8217;t have your cake and brag about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre</title>
		<link>http://nicharalambous.com/2008/10/16/does-elitism-stifle-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-9805</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicharalambous.com/?p=1549#comment-9805</guid>
		<description>EXMI said it quite clearly:
&quot;Creating an elitism, your own, or attempting to fit into others’ is based on exclusion&quot;, two comments up.

And, she&#039;s right on the money, in the pejorative use of the word, Elitism that we&#039;re discussing. In fact some sources (Wikipedia, for one) go as far as to suggest that &quot;discrimination&quot; could be a more accurate term for this kind of Elitism.

&quot;The term elitism is also sometimes misused to denote situations in which a group of people claiming to possess high abilities or simply an in-group or cadre grant themselves extra privileges at the expense of others. This debased form of elitism may be described as discrimination.&quot;

Discrimination = Exclusionary. Fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EXMI said it quite clearly:<br />
&#8220;Creating an elitism, your own, or attempting to fit into others’ is based on exclusion&#8221;, two comments up.</p>
<p>And, she&#8217;s right on the money, in the pejorative use of the word, Elitism that we&#8217;re discussing. In fact some sources (Wikipedia, for one) go as far as to suggest that &#8220;discrimination&#8221; could be a more accurate term for this kind of Elitism.</p>
<p>&#8220;The term elitism is also sometimes misused to denote situations in which a group of people claiming to possess high abilities or simply an in-group or cadre grant themselves extra privileges at the expense of others. This debased form of elitism may be described as discrimination.&#8221;</p>
<p>Discrimination = Exclusionary. Fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nic</title>
		<link>http://nicharalambous.com/2008/10/16/does-elitism-stifle-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-9804</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicharalambous.com/?p=1549#comment-9804</guid>
		<description>Wogan, I see your point, but who ever said that elitism is necessarily exclusionary?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wogan, I see your point, but who ever said that elitism is necessarily exclusionary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wogan</title>
		<link>http://nicharalambous.com/2008/10/16/does-elitism-stifle-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-9803</link>
		<dc:creator>Wogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicharalambous.com/?p=1549#comment-9803</guid>
		<description>@Nic Socialism? You&#039;re leaning towards extremism, lol. Socialism is a far cry from collaboration, which is what I&#039;m talking about.

Yes, I agree that you must do the best for yourself, but only to an extent. At some point, the best thing you could &lt;i&gt;possibly&lt;/i&gt; do for yourself, is work with others, enter into collaborative projects, and sacrifice a little time to create something bigger than yourself.

Elitists only focus on themselves, and what&#039;s best for them, disregarding the core values of the sphere they&#039;re trying to be elitist in. In 2008, you just can&#039;t do that anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nic Socialism? You&#8217;re leaning towards extremism, lol. Socialism is a far cry from collaboration, which is what I&#8217;m talking about.</p>
<p>Yes, I agree that you must do the best for yourself, but only to an extent. At some point, the best thing you could <i>possibly</i> do for yourself, is work with others, enter into collaborative projects, and sacrifice a little time to create something bigger than yourself.</p>
<p>Elitists only focus on themselves, and what&#8217;s best for them, disregarding the core values of the sphere they&#8217;re trying to be elitist in. In 2008, you just can&#8217;t do that anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nic</title>
		<link>http://nicharalambous.com/2008/10/16/does-elitism-stifle-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-9802</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicharalambous.com/?p=1549#comment-9802</guid>
		<description>Wogan - You seem to be speaking and leaning towards socialism. Unfortunately socialism does not exist. Altruism is also a fallacy. That doesn&#039;t exist either. I need to do the best for myself - but that must NEVER involve destroying someone else or their reputation. That part I 100% agree with you on. 

Andre - Agreed to a point. I personally much prefer making my point with actions. So if I can begin to do well for myself and my clique or support structure and in the end through my action remove the &quot;bully&quot; from the game, then so be it. Someone once told me &quot;The best revenge is to live well&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wogan &#8211; You seem to be speaking and leaning towards socialism. Unfortunately socialism does not exist. Altruism is also a fallacy. That doesn&#8217;t exist either. I need to do the best for myself &#8211; but that must NEVER involve destroying someone else or their reputation. That part I 100% agree with you on. </p>
<p>Andre &#8211; Agreed to a point. I personally much prefer making my point with actions. So if I can begin to do well for myself and my clique or support structure and in the end through my action remove the &#8220;bully&#8221; from the game, then so be it. Someone once told me &#8220;The best revenge is to live well&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExMi</title>
		<link>http://nicharalambous.com/2008/10/16/does-elitism-stifle-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-9800</link>
		<dc:creator>ExMi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 08:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicharalambous.com/?p=1549#comment-9800</guid>
		<description>too true, wogan, too true.

instead the focus should be on collectively achieving something. Not as an individual, but as a gathering. Creating an elitism, your own, or attempting to fit into others&#039; is based on exclusion, and from what i gather, that&#039;s not what blogging/twitter etc is about.

it&#039;s about inclusion - getting as many people as possible sharing opinions on something, learning from each other and growing.

How does an elitism, in any way, shape or form contribute to that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>too true, wogan, too true.</p>
<p>instead the focus should be on collectively achieving something. Not as an individual, but as a gathering. Creating an elitism, your own, or attempting to fit into others&#8217; is based on exclusion, and from what i gather, that&#8217;s not what blogging/twitter etc is about.</p>
<p>it&#8217;s about inclusion &#8211; getting as many people as possible sharing opinions on something, learning from each other and growing.</p>
<p>How does an elitism, in any way, shape or form contribute to that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre</title>
		<link>http://nicharalambous.com/2008/10/16/does-elitism-stifle-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-9799</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 08:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicharalambous.com/?p=1549#comment-9799</guid>
		<description>Nic, facing up to a bully in school is admirable. Removing the bully from school is far better.
:))
Glad to see another blogger that I admire, throw his hat in the ring. Robust debate. Bravo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nic, facing up to a bully in school is admirable. Removing the bully from school is far better.<br />
 <img src='http://nicharalambous.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> )<br />
Glad to see another blogger that I admire, throw his hat in the ring. Robust debate. Bravo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wogan</title>
		<link>http://nicharalambous.com/2008/10/16/does-elitism-stifle-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-9798</link>
		<dc:creator>Wogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 08:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicharalambous.com/?p=1549#comment-9798</guid>
		<description>The &quot;perceived elitism&quot;, as you call it, is far from knocking us down. The last line in my post mentioned that we&#039;ll have to find a way to set that elitism aside in order to grow as a sphere.

I&#039;m all for taking over South Africa and getting everyone on Twitter/blogging (dream that&#039;ll probably never come true, oh well), but if we stop now, and consider ourselves &quot;there&quot; in terms of growth, we&#039;ll never get beyond 0.01% penetration.

Elitism shouldn&#039;t be a driving force. It basically means you want to get better and bigger so you can show it off to the rest of the world. That&#039;s not the right way to do it, imo. Because then, everything you do feeds back into your own ego, it&#039;s all about you, and eventually, people move on - what you got left, then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;perceived elitism&#8221;, as you call it, is far from knocking us down. The last line in my post mentioned that we&#8217;ll have to find a way to set that elitism aside in order to grow as a sphere.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for taking over South Africa and getting everyone on Twitter/blogging (dream that&#8217;ll probably never come true, oh well), but if we stop now, and consider ourselves &#8220;there&#8221; in terms of growth, we&#8217;ll never get beyond 0.01% penetration.</p>
<p>Elitism shouldn&#8217;t be a driving force. It basically means you want to get better and bigger so you can show it off to the rest of the world. That&#8217;s not the right way to do it, imo. Because then, everything you do feeds back into your own ego, it&#8217;s all about you, and eventually, people move on &#8211; what you got left, then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

