Full or partial RSS feeds - Follow up
Filed Under (Uncategorized) by Nic on 26-09-2007
Tagged Under : feed readers, feeds, RSS
Hi and welcome to my blog! If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting and do come back.
This is a fairly tough post to be writing because I really don’t have any conclusive answers to the questions I posed and thoughts I put forward in my first post about RSS feeds.
After I blogged about full vs partial feeds I decided to make my feeds partial. The only response I have had has been bad. Two people have emailed me saying that they are close to unsubscribing to my feed cause the feeds were partial. This, in theory, is enough to make me revert back to full feeds.
Justin and I were chatting about this issue further and we both believe that SA bloggers need to start creating RSS subscribers as a point. Instead of simply blogging and rambling on, we should start doing whatever we can as bloggers to get the number of RSS subscribers up on our blogs. This will assist in creating hits for your blog irrespective of whether you use full or partial feeds.
One of the biggest issues that has been raised with me is that people using RSS do so because they don’t have time to read every blog they wish to at the blog itself. This makes sense to me actually. By offering partial feeds for about two weeks now, all I have really done is piss off RSS users.
Justin then had a great point, he liked one of the posts on my blog - links to WP themems. He clicked through to my site and was then sent to the theme. He wanted to comment on my post but had already clicked 3 times to somewhere else and was over it. If I had full RSS feeds he could’ve clicked through to my post and the link site and seen bot and commented on both with far greater ease. Good point.
I may have received a visit from Justin, but I missed out on his comment. Which is worth more to you as an author?
So my conclusion is Full posts in RSS are far better for me and my audience. So back to full posts it is. As of now.













yesss! Well done!
I agree with both of you - the reason a site has RSS is to make it easier to read 250 blogs a day. You can’t do that if you have to visit the site for every article. It totally defeats the logic behind RSS. I’m glad you’ve come back to the light.
I have seen the light but I do believe that everyone needs to try out the two options and see what suits them, their goals and their readers best. It is definitely not a standard thing.
Personally i prefer partial feeds, mainly becasue i use them as filters, ie i want something to entice me to visit that site not churn through 9 gazillion full feeds, it also brings the user to the site which ups impressions etc etc.
It would be nice if it could be a user based preference - ie when you subscribe you could select full or partial.
Now there is a great idea, user based preferences. I think that is one of the best Ideas I have heard in a long time. That way, as an author, you aren’t pissing anyone off with your feeds!!
Yes I think this should be a feature request for Wordpress and Feedburner. If you could decide what you want then this debate is essentially over.
http://wordpress.org/extend/ideas/topic.php?id=864&page&replies=1#post-3869
Better yet try out a plugin
http://www.scratch99.com/wordpress-plugin-dualfeeds/
[...] have posted a fair amount in the last month about full vs partial RSS [...]